{"contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"jackjacobs"}

Time Wounds All Heals

In The New York Times of Sunday, August 23, 2009, in the first section of the paper but inconspicuously buried below the fold on page 24, was a brief Associated Press story about William Calley. Somewhat belatedly, it reported that the previous Wednesday Calley had surfaced from 38 years of obscurity to address about 50 members of the Kiwanis Club of Greater Columbus, Georgia.

He isn't the first murderer to attempt to salve his conscience, but for many of my fellow combat soldiers there is nothing he can ever do to deserve anyone's forgiveness.

In 1968, Calley was a Army lieutenant in Vietnam with his unit, Company C, 1st Battalion 20th Infantry, a part of the 23rd Infantry Division, also known as the "Americal." The name, purportedly a contraction of "American, New Caledonian" Division, was a vestige of the unit's service in the South Pacific in World War II, when it was one of only two US divisions with a name but no number.

Although every armed conflict generates its share of tragedies, the atrocious conduct of Calley and the soldiers he led was particularly heinous and serves as a sobering benchmark for what can happen when people have no moral compass.

On March 16, 1968, in a hamlet that became known as My Lai, more than 350---and perhaps as many as 500---Vietnamese civilians, most of them women, children and the elderly, were slaughtered by Calley and his men. Calley was convicted of murder in 1971 and sentenced to life in prison. To the president's great discredit, Richard Nixon arranged for Calley to serve not in prison but under house arrest at Fort Benning, Georgia, and after a habeus corpus appeal, a court found that Calley's trial was tainted by publicity and ordered him released. In the end, for participating in the premediated murder of hundreds of people, William Calley served a total sentence of about 3 1/2 years under house arrest.

The reasons advanced to excuse the behavior of Calley and his men are well-worn and familiar: he was just following orders; previously, the unit had lost men killed and wounded and was stressed-out; in Vietnam one could never distinguish between friendly civilians and enemy troops. None can excuse inexcusable behavior. And exceptionally galling in Calley's session with the Columbus Kiwanis was his statement that he still feels remorse for "what happened that day in My Lai." The use of the passive voice---"mistakes were made" and all that nonsense---is the favorite construct of the guilty who want to make it sound as if someone else, or circumstances beyong their control, were to blame.

I have spent as much time in vicious and continuous armed combat as most soldiers and have never encountered---nor can I conceive---a tactical situation in which it is difficult to distinguish between right and wrong. To be sure, innocent people are killed accidentally in war, but for the majority of us the premeditated slaughter of unarmed non-combatants ranks as a war crime, the guilt for which can never be expiated.

For some, the story of the monstrous behavior of William Calley is best left to dissipate quietly. But it is not. Thomas Jefferson, who himself understood the difference between right and wrong and was still capable of choosing to do wrong, observed, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." It is painful to reflect on the cost of freedom, but it is a cost that will have to be paid by those who love their country. It is similarly painful to resurrect the horrible story of My Lai, but it is occasionally helpful to be reminded of the reprehensible things people can do so that we will never find it easy to excuse them.

{"contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"jackjacobs"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
{"commentId":9038842,"authorDomain":"cookaerospace"}

Well, my take on this is that it is not Calley's fault but a Pentagon war plan that favored chasing about between villages on search and destroy fools errands instead of just establishing a reasonable limit of what you could defend and then building a strategically defensible wall to keep the VC out.

I believe that we could have done this and we could have reasonably and effectively defended about one-third of the Republic of South Vietnam. I believe we could have defeated tunneling under the perimeter (a fence) we would have been obliged to build. I believe that using draftees to man the fence would not have traumatized conscripted soldiers so much as to play into an anti-war frenzy. I believe we could have limited our war dead to approximately today's number of American war dead in Iraq by adopting such a strictly defensive strategy. I believe American air power should never, ever, have bombed more than two miles out from our fence, never over North Vietnam, Laos, or Cambodia. We would have lost very, very few P.O.W.'s consequently and not had that tool used against us.

I believe Agent Orange should have been employed only within 5 kms. of the fence on either side. I believe every military engagement within the fence perimeter should have been handed by ARVN with American air support.

I believe fences work and Westmoreland and most of the Pentagon brass at that time were idiots.

{"commentId":9038842,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"cookaerospace"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:39 PM EDT
{"commentId":9065929,"authorDomain":"jackjacobs"}

There is no doubt that those at the strategic level made decisions the result of which were the deaths of non-combatatants. But at My Lai, it was Calley's fault. At his level of command, there is a big difference between the regrettable deaths of non-combatatants during a battle and the premeditated slaughter of unarmed people. Read the trial transcript or at least the published eyewitness stories.

{"commentId":9065929,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"jackjacobs"}
  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:41 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":9046017,"authorDomain":"kpeltonen85"}

Hotheads at the infantry level lead to mistakes. Hotheads at the command level lead to catastrophe. I think that is a major issue that was not pressed upon, particularly the Marine Corps, at the start of the Iraq/Afghanistan conflicts. No good will come of killing civilians or revenge rampages. If there's a guerilla playbook out there, forcing the enemy into killing civilians would be on the first page.

{"commentId":9046017,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"kpeltonen85"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:20 PM EDT
{"commentId":9070264,"authorDomain":"lambchop"}

Is it easier or harder in our current war (pick one) to distinguish between the "good guys" and the "bady guys" as compared to Vietnam? Great article, by the way, lovely reminder that there actually is a choice between good and evil, right and wrong.

{"commentId":9070264,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"lambchop"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:29 AM EDT
{"commentId":9087894,"authorDomain":"tom-carter"}

Great article, Jack, and I agree with everything you said. The My Lai massacre came to light between my two tours in Vietnam. I couldn't believe it at first, until the details were known.

There is never an excuse for soldiers to kill civilians who present no threat. It doesn't matter what strategic mistakes were made at higher levels, the local conditions of combat, or the orders received from above. It's murder, plain and simple. Nixon's action regarding Calley was shameful, and Calley should continue keeping his head down and his mouth shut. He's a disgrace.

{"commentId":9087894,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"tom-carter"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:47 PM EDT
{"commentId":9088165,"authorDomain":"happilyretired"}

Considering his comments of just 2 years ago..

Sadly, however, William Calley - who has never demonstrated the slightest desire to make his peace with the Vietnamese people - was not even willing to discuss it this week. Unless, of course, he received a fat fee.

"Meet me in the lobby of the nearest bank at opening time tomorrow, and give me a certified cheque for $25,000, then I'll talk to you for precisely one hour," he drawled nauseatingly. (Source: Daily Mail)

As for his apology.... is it really....

He did not deny what had happened that day, but did repeatedly make the point — which he has made before — that he was following orders. (Source: Ledger Enquirer)
{"commentId":9088165,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"happilyretired"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:08 AM EDT
{"commentId":9089299,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

Colonel Jack:

The reasons advanced to excuse the behavior of Calley and his men are well-worn and familiar:

Shrug. A shockingly large majority of the American public at the time and an all but unanimous proportion of the military at the time bought those reasons. The President at the time exploited those sentiments for partisan purposes.

If you were among the tiny minority of the officariat who spoke out at the time as you do now, then there's no words to express my respect and admiration for you. If not .... well, we all have to go along to get along, but I don't see anything special about that.

When I lived in Lafayette, Louisiana for a time I was honored to make the acquaintance of the late Hugh Thompson. He was always convinced that the true miscarriage of justice was Medina's acquittal.

{"commentId":9089299,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:19 AM EDT
{"commentId":9112921,"authorDomain":"jackjacobs"}

Both when the massacre came to light, and later at the time of the trial, a very large number of junior officers of my acquaintance spoke vehemently and publicly about the reprehensible nature of the incident and the behavior of Calley and his men. As for Medina, all of the professionals I knew at the time agreed that Medina's acquittal was a hideous miscarriage of justice.

{"commentId":9112921,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"jackjacobs"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#7 - Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:04 AM EDT
{"commentId":9114725,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

Colonel Jack:

spoke vehemently and publicly about the reprehensible nature of the incident and the behavior of Calley and his men.

Well then, words can't express the depth of respect and admiration I have. That was a hard thing to do.

{"commentId":9114725,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 2 votes
#7.1 - Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:38 AM EDT
{"commentId":9262088,"authorDomain":"tom-carter"}
...an all but unanimous proportion of the military at the time bought those reasons.

You're wrong. I don't remember anyone in the military accepting any excuse for Calley's behavior. I and everyone I knew thought My Lai was reprehensible and a blot on all of us. Moreover, most thought that in addition to Calley, Medina and more senior officers in Calley's chain of command should have received greater punishment.

{"commentId":9262088,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"tom-carter"}
  • 1 vote
#7.2 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 9:41 AM EDT
{"commentId":9263357,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

Tom:

Shrug. The American Legion funded his defense, quite ostentatiously in fact.

I'm sure there were individual service members who felt as you say, and some who spoke up at the time and said what you felt. But that puts you in a distinct minority.

Nobody wants to remember what a folk hero Calley was back in the day. He was popularly regarded as a scapegoat and in many respects a victim himself. It's easy to say now "He shouldda hung." It was hard to say "He should hang" back in '71.

{"commentId":9263357,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 3 votes
#7.3 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 11:37 AM EDT
{"commentId":10323878,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

Everybody deserves a fair trial, and legal counsel is part of that. I don't remember what the American Legion said about the case.

But on the folk hero part, absolutely.

I don't know about the military, but my memory is of many in the general public calling Calley a hero at the time.

Googled: The Hero Calley - Feb. 15, 1971

Longer Time article: The Nation: The Clamor Over Calley: Who Shares the Guilt? April 12, 1972

...
The widespread initial reaction to My Lai—that no American soldier could have done such a thing—in many cases changed to the notion that Calley had only been doing his duty. In a new book called Sanctions for Evil, the title of one chapter sardonically sums up the horrendous confusion: "It Never Happened and Besides They Deserved It."
...
Indiana's Governor Edgar Whitcomb, a World War II veteran, ordered all flags on state property flown at half-mast in protest against the verdict. Alabama's Governor George Wallace paid a twelve-minute call on the lieutenant en route to a pro-Calley rally that was also attended by Mississippi's Governor John Bell Williams and Georgia's Lieut. Governor Lester Maddox. Draft boards in Athens, Ga., and Huron County, Mich., resigned en masse.
....
The Battle Hymn of Lieutenant Calley, which reportedly sold 202,000 copies in the first three days after the verdict.
...
Colonel Robert Rheault, former commander of U.S. Special Forces in Viet Nam, makes a different point. "Calley is guilty of murder," says Rheault, himself a onetime (never tried) murder suspect in the famous 1969 Green Beret triple-agent case. As an expert on anti-guerrilla warfare in Viet Nam, Rheault told TIME last week: "Nobody ever had a policy of mowing down women and children. Our policy was to protect women and children as much as possible."
...

I probably read that, or other very similar ones, back then. That was around the time I began to wonder what the heck we were trying to do over there.

near the end:

Major Brown, the pensive juror, believes that if the verdict is "tearing this country apart, it is good because maybe it will make [Americans] look within themselves to find out what's wrong. I don't think it will hurt the U.S."

Many never did. What do you bet Dick Cheney & G.W. still think Calley a hero? They still don't get it.

{"commentId":10323878,"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
  • 1 vote
#7.4 - Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:17 PM EDT
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"659280","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"659280","contentId":"3186595"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking
Col. Jack Jacobs's Latest Comments
Comments & Feedback
– Show More